Screener
SBND vs PHYL
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF vs PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SBND and PHYL are fixed income ETFs. SBND charges 0.25% a year and PHYL 0.39%. The main difference: SBND follows a index tracking strategy; PHYL uses active selection.
- SBND follows a index tracking strategy; PHYL uses active selection.
- SBND costs 0.14% less per year.
- PHYL is much larger than SBND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, PHYL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBND | PHYL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $215M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.51% | 7.66% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.43% | 3.31% |
| Max drawdown | -10.53% | -22.07% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.