Screener
SBND vs SYFI
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF vs AB Short Duration High Yield ETF
Key differences
- SBND costs 0.15% less per year.
- SYFI is significantly larger than SBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBND is classified as fixed income, while SYFI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SBND follows a index tracking strategy; SYFI uses active selection.
- SYFI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBND | SYFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $202M | $895M |
| Since | 2021 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.54% | 6.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.50% | 3.20% |
| Max drawdown | -10.53% | -4.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBND and SYFI
Explore further