Screener
SCAP vs CGMU
Infrastructure Capital Small Cap Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 1.93% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than SCAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCAP is classified as equity, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SCAP covers global markets; CGMU covers north america.
- SCAP follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCAP | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.20% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.96% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.10% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -24.13% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCAP and CGMU
Explore further