Screener
SCCR vs EYEG
Schwab Core Bond ETF vs AB Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCCR costs 0.14% less per year.
- SCCR is significantly larger than EYEG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCCR is classified as fixed income, while EYEG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SCCR follows a active selection strategy; EYEG uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCCR | EYEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $26M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.47% | 4.98% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.84% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -2.81% | -4.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCCR and EYEG
Explore further