Screener
SCCR vs GTOQ
Schwab Core Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCCR costs 0.23% less per year.
- SCCR is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCCR is classified as fixed income, while GTOQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SCCR follows a active selection strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
- GTOQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCCR | GTOQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $162M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.47% | 6.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.84% | 3.76% |
| Max drawdown | -2.81% | -15.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCCR and GTOQ
Explore further