Screener
SCHA vs ACSG
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- SCHA costs 0.45% less per year.
- SCHA is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHA follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- SCHA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHA | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | $15M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.08% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.41% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHA and ACSG
Explore further