Screener
SCHA vs LRGC
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Key differences
- SCHA costs 0.35% less per year.
- SCHA is significantly larger than LRGC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHA follows a index tracking strategy; LRGC uses active selection.
- SCHA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHA | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.08% | 12.03% |
| Max drawdown | -42.41% | -19.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHA and LRGC
Explore further