Screener
SCHA vs SMMD
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SCHA costs 0.11% less per year.
- SCHA is significantly larger than SMMD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHA | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | $3.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.08% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -42.41% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHA and SMMD
Explore further