Screener
SCHC vs KAT
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- SCHC costs 0.67% less per year.
- SCHC is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHC follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHC | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | $688M |
| Since | 2010 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.34% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.45% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.94% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHC and KAT
Explore further