Screener
SCHD vs EFAS
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- SCHD costs 0.49% less per year.
- SCHD is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHD covers north america markets; EFAS covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHD | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91.1B | $48M |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.29% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.01% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -33.37% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHD and EFAS
Explore further