Screener
SCHE vs KAT
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- SCHE costs 0.68% less per year.
- SCHE is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHE follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHE | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.3B | $688M |
| Since | 2010 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHE and KAT
Explore further