Screener
SCHF vs CGGO
Schwab International Equity ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.44% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than CGGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHF covers global ex us markets; CGGO covers global.
- SCHF follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHF | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $63.0B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.83% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -34.87% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHF and CGGO
Explore further