Screener
SCHF vs GSIE
Schwab International Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than GSIE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHF covers global ex us markets; GSIE covers global.
- SCHF follows a index tracking strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHF | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $63.0B | $5.6B |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.72% | 14.21% |
| Max drawdown | -34.87% | -34.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHF and GSIE
Explore further