Screener
SCHF vs SAMT
Schwab International Equity ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.63% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than SAMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHF is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SCHF follows a index tracking strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHF | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $63.0B | $619M |
| Since | 2009 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.83% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -34.87% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHF and SAMT
Explore further