Screener
SCHG vs GSLC
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHG is significantly larger than GSLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHG follows a index tracking strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHG | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55.6B | $15.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 11.86% |
| Max drawdown | -34.59% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHG and GSLC
Explore further