Screener
SCHG vs HAPS
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF vs Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.57% less per year.
- SCHG is significantly larger than HAPS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHG | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55.6B | $157M |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 17.11% |
| Max drawdown | -34.59% | -27.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHG and HAPS
Explore further