Screener
SCHG vs SAWG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF vs AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.45% less per year.
- SCHG is significantly larger than SAWG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHG follows a index tracking strategy; SAWG uses active selection.
- SCHG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHG | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55.6B | $3M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 12.51% |
| Max drawdown | -34.59% | -18.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHG and SAWG
Explore further