Screener
SCHI vs GBND
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCHI costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHI is significantly larger than GBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHI follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- SCHI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHI | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.6B | $480M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.03% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.20% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.67% | -2.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHI and GBND
Explore further