Screener
SCHK vs BASG
Schwab 1000 ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.58% less per year.
- SCHK is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHK covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
- SCHK follows a index tracking strategy; BASG uses active selection.
- SCHK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHK | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $467M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.80% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHK and BASG
Explore further