Screener
SCHK vs KAT
Schwab 1000 ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.72% less per year.
- SCHK is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHK follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHK | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $688M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.80% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHK and KAT
Explore further