Screener
SCHK vs SMMD
Schwab 1000 ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.12% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHK | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $3.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -34.80% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHK and SMMD
Explore further