Screener
SCHK vs SPAM
Schwab 1000 ETF vs Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCHK is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHK | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $2M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.7% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | 25.42% |
| Max drawdown | -34.80% | -24.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHK and SPAM
Explore further