Screener
SCHM vs IWR
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHM costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than SCHM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.3B | $52.6B |
| Since | 2011 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.72% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -42.43% | -40.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHM and IWR
Explore further