Screener
SCHO vs GGOV
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SCHO and GGOV are fixed income ETFs. SCHO charges 0.03% a year and GGOV 0.39%. The main difference: SCHO costs 0.36% less per year.
- SCHO costs 0.36% less per year.
- SCHO is much larger than GGOV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHO | GGOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.2B | $44M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.94% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.69% | -1.54% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.