Screener
SCHO vs GKAT
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.56% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHO is classified as fixed income, while GKAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SCHO follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHO | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.5B | $158M |
| Since | 2010 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.69% | -10.41% |
Similar to SCHO and GKAT
Explore further