Screener
SCHQ vs ICSH
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.05% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHQ follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHQ | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $897M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.3% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.1% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.31 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.07% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -46.13% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHQ and ICSH
Explore further