Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SCHQ vs SPTS

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF

SCHQ

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$897M

SPTS

State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$6.0B

Key differences

  • SPTS is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SPTS has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SPTS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SCHQSPTS
Annual cost (TER)0.03%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$897M$6.0B
Since20192011
Dividend yield4.76%3.94%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.6%+3.5%
CAGR 3Y-1.3%+4.0%
CAGR 5Y-5.1%+1.8%
Sharpe 3Y-0.310.21
Volatility 1Y9.07%1.32%
Max drawdown-46.13%-5.71%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SCHQ and SPTS