Screener
SCHR vs SCHQ
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHR is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHR | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.0B | $897M |
| Since | 2010 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.89% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.9% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | -0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.46% | 9.07% |
| Max drawdown | -16.11% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHR and SCHQ
Explore further