Screener
SCHV vs DFAS
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHV follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHV | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $14.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.69% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -37.08% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHV and DFAS
Explore further