Screener
SCHV vs NUSC
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF vs Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.27% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than NUSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHV | NUSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.69% | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -37.08% | -41.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHV and NUSC
Explore further