Screener
SCHV vs REVS
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.15% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHV | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $284M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.71% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -37.08% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHV and REVS
Explore further