Screener
SCHZ vs NUSA
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SCHZ and NUSA are fixed income ETFs. SCHZ charges 0.03% a year and NUSA 0.14%. The main difference: SCHZ costs 0.11% less per year.
- SCHZ costs 0.11% less per year.
- SCHZ is much larger than NUSA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHZ | NUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.3B | $34M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | 3.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.77% | 1.81% |
| Max drawdown | -18.74% | -9.44% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.