Screener
SCIO vs UCON
First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Smith Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCIO costs 0.16% less per year.
- UCON is significantly larger than SCIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCIO is classified as alternative, while UCON is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SCIO follows a multi strategy strategy; UCON uses active selection.
- UCON has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCIO | UCON | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.86% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $357M | $3.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 6.09% | 4.65% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.83% | 3.00% |
| Max drawdown | -1.72% | -15.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCIO and UCON
Explore further