Screener
SCMB vs FBND
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCMB costs 0.33% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than SCMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCMB covers north america markets; FBND covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, FBND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCMB | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.7B | $25.6B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.41% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.17 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.92% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -6.13% | -17.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCMB and FBND
Explore further