Screener
SCOW vs LCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Key differences
- LCOW costs 0.10% less per year.
- LCOW is significantly larger than SCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCOW | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $23M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -10.09% | -10.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCOW and LCOW
Explore further