Screener
SCUB vs CGCB
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGCB is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and CGCB
Explore further