Screener
SCUB vs CSHP
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- CSHP costs 0.10% less per year.
- CSHP is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB covers north america markets; CSHP covers global.
- SCUB follows a active selection strategy; CSHP uses index tracking.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | CSHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $190M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 5.10% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.34% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -0.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and CSHP
Explore further