Screener
SCUB vs HYDB
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- HYDB is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB follows a active selection strategy; HYDB uses index tracking.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and HYDB
Explore further