Screener
SCUB vs HYSD
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
Key differences
- SCUB costs 0.14% less per year.
- HYSD is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | HYSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $105M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.83% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and HYSD
Explore further