Screener
SCUB vs IMTB
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.24% less per year.
- IMTB is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB follows a active selection strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $280M |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and IMTB
Explore further