Screener
SCUB vs SCUS
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- SCUS costs 0.16% less per year.
- SCUS is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | SCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $224M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -0.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and SCUS
Explore further