Screener
SCUS vs JPST
Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF vs JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- JPST is significantly larger than SCUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUS follows a active selection strategy; JPST uses index tracking.
- JPST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUS | JPST | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $224M | $37.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.03% | 4.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.67% | 0.53% |
| Max drawdown | -0.17% | -3.28% |
Similar to SCUS and JPST
Explore further