Screener
SCUS vs SCHJ
Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF vs Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCHJ costs 0.11% less per year.
- SCHJ is significantly larger than SCUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUS follows a active selection strategy; SCHJ uses index tracking.
- SCHJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUS | SCHJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $224M | $759M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.03% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | 1.87% |
| Max drawdown | -0.17% | -13.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUS and SCHJ
Explore further