Screener
SCUS vs SCUB
Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCUS costs 0.16% less per year.
- SCUS is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUS | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $224M | $25M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.03% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.17% | -0.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUS and SCUB
Explore further