Screener
SCYB vs HYDW
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF vs Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCYB costs 0.17% less per year.
- SCYB is significantly larger than HYDW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYDW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCYB | HYDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $66M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 6.97% | 5.58% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.80% | 3.02% |
| Max drawdown | -4.92% | -17.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCYB and HYDW
Explore further