Screener
SCYB vs SCUS
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- SCYB costs 0.11% less per year.
- SCYB is significantly larger than SCUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCYB follows a index tracking strategy; SCUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCYB | SCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $224M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.97% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.80% | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -4.92% | -0.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCYB and SCUS
Explore further