Screener
SCZ vs IEFA
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.33% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than SCZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCZ | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $180.7B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.44% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -41.07% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCZ and IEFA
Explore further