Screener
SECT vs BBBL
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Global X Funds
Key differences
- BBBL costs 0.50% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than BBBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while BBBL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; BBBL uses index tracking.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | BBBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $5M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 5.78% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 8.04% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -9.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and BBBL
Explore further