Screener
SECT vs BTR
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- SECT costs 0.39% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than BTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $37M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and BTR
Explore further