Screener
SECT vs FBND
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
- FBND costs 0.33% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than SECT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while FBND is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT covers north america markets; FBND covers global.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; FBND uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $25.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -17.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and FBND
Explore further